Will Car Insurance Ever Go Down Again?

Introduction

Over the past five years most drivers have felt a steady pinch at renewal time: premiums have climbed, deductibles have shifted, and coverage options have become more expensive. In the United States the average annual auto insurance premium rose from roughly $1,120 in 2019 to an estimated $1,820 by mid‑2024, reflecting a cumulative increase in the neighborhood of 62%. This introduction frames why many consumers ask the pressing question: will car insurance ever go down again? The short answer is “maybe,” but the path to lower premiums depends on measurable market forces that are only now beginning to show signs of easing in some regions.

Several converging factors drove the recent increases, and each has a realistic, quantifiable effect. Crash frequency rose after the pandemic as travel rebounded, with claims frequency up approximately 7–9% year‑over‑year between 2021 and 2023 in many states. Repair costs jumped because of supply chain disruptions and the increasing complexity of modern cars; replacement parts prices are widely reported to have climbed 20–35% in the same period. Insurers also cite growing medical and litigation costs that pushed payouts higher. When these elements are combined, the actuarial math that sets premiums left little room for reductions.

That said, there are concrete scenarios where premiums can and do fall. Technological advances that reduce accident severity, such as improved driver assistance systems and broader adoption of telematics, can lower claims frequency and severity. Regulatory changes and increased competition in local markets also pressure carriers to offer lower rates. As Dr. Maria Lopez, Senior Economist at Insurance Insights, puts it: “Premiums respond to losses. If we see consistent declines in loss ratios—say, a 3–5% reduction sustained over 18 months—insurers will have compelling grounds to reduce rate filings and pass savings to consumers.” Her assessment underscores that reductions are contingent on sustained, not temporary, improvements in underwriting results.

When experts describe the mechanics of premium setting, they point to both macro and micro levers. Ken Marshall, Claims Director at SafeWay Insurance, explains that repair timelines directly affect cost: “A single week of parts backorder can increase labor and storage costs by hundreds of dollars per claim. In 2022 we documented average delay-related surcharges of $120 per claim when OEM parts were unavailable.” That kind of operational pressure feeds straight into loss costs that underwriters must cover.

Realistic, data‑driven expectations are essential for consumers. Consider the variations across states and by vehicle type: drivers of compact sedans generally saw smaller increases than owners of SUVs and pickup trucks because repair costs and theft rates differ. According to industry compilations, drivers in high-density urban states experienced the largest hikes—sometimes 20–30% above the national average—while rural areas saw smaller adjustments. “Geography matters,” notes Dr. Aisha Rahman, Automotive Economist at the University of Michigan. “Two otherwise similar drivers can have wildly different rate trajectories purely because of where they live and how often they drive.”

For drivers wondering about a timeline, experts offer cautious optimism. Liam O’Connor, CEO at AutoTech Repair Network, observes a normalization of parts availability and a flattening in parts inflation: “After an 18‑month window of severe shortages, we have seen OEM lead times improve by roughly 40% since late 2023. That alone removes a persistent upward pressure on repair costs.” If these operational trends continue, insurers will likely see claims costs stabilize, which is the first prerequisite for rate relief.

Yet stabilization does not automatically equate to lower premiums. Insurers must also rebuild reserve positions that were drained during high‑loss years. That rebuilding process often requires maintaining higher rates for a period to ensure solvency and regulatory compliance. “Companies typically need multiple quarters of favorable loss development before regulators approve meaningful reductions,” explains Dr. Maria Lopez. In practical terms, consumers should expect incremental changes—localized decreases and targeted discounts—before broad, nationwide premium reductions become visible.

In short, car insurance can decline again, but it is not automatic or immediate. The necessary conditions include sustained declines in loss trends, continued easing of parts and labor inflation, improved risk mitigation through technology, and the rebuilding of insurer reserves. As policymakers, repair networks, and insurers respond to these signals, consumers should watch for localized rate changes, increased availability of telematics discounts, and targeted relief in states where loss trends improve fastest. The remainder of this article will unpack each of these drivers in depth, show what to watch for in rate filings, and outline practical steps drivers can take now to reduce costs while waiting for broader market adjustments.

Why Car Insurance Has Risen: Economic, Technological, and Social Drivers

The rise in car insurance premiums over the last several years is not the result of a single cause but the intersection of economic pressures, changing vehicle technology, and shifting social behaviors. Insurers price policies based on the frequency and cost of claims, and both have moved sharply upward. On the economic side, general inflation has increased parts, labor, and medical costs; on the technological side, cars are now more expensive to repair after a crash; and socially, driving patterns and risky behaviors have changed since the pandemic. Together these forces have pushed average premiums from roughly $1,000 per year a decade ago to about $1,900 per year in 2023 for the typical U.S. private passenger policy, a near doubling in many markets.

To put the major drivers in perspective, the table below breaks down the principal factors insurers and analysts say have contributed to the rise in premiums and gives a rough sense of their relative impact. These are estimates meant to illustrate scale rather than precise accounting for any single insurer.

“We saw average claim severity rise by roughly 35% between 2019 and 2023,” said Dr. Elena Rodriguez, Senior Economist at the Insurance Research Council. “That jump comes from a mix of pricier replacement parts, higher labor costs at repair shops, and more complex vehicle systems that take longer to fix.” A tangible example is the cost of replacing an advanced radar or lidar sensor after a collision: in many modern cars that one component replacement can add $2,000–$4,000 to the repair bill.

An historical view of average premiums illustrates the cumulative effect. The next table shows representative average annual premiums for private passenger policies in selected years; these numbers reflect the general trend most consumers have experienced across many states.

“Beyond replacement parts, labor availability has tightened. Auto technicians are in short supply and their hourly rates have risen, particularly for tech-savvy repairs,” explained Tom Miller, Chief Actuary at MidState Insurance. “A two-hour diagnostic that cost $150 five years ago can easily be $300–$400 today once you factor specialty shop rates.” Higher labor rates directly translate into higher claim payouts and thus higher premiums for drivers overall.

Social patterns also matter. After the initial pandemic decline in travel, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rebounded to around 95–98% of pre-pandemic levels by 2022, and certain segments—delivery drivers and young drivers—recorded above-average increases in miles and risk exposure. “We are seeing more frequent claims in urban and suburban corridors where phone use and in-car distractions have become a major factor,” said Prof. Marcus Lee, a transportation safety researcher at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. “Crash counts per million miles ticked up in multiple states, which insurers have to reflect in pricing.”

Finally, fraud and litigation have amplified losses in some regions. “Organized fraud rings and staged accidents rose materially in parts of the country, increasing claim counts and legal expenses by a noticeable margin,” noted Aisha Khan, Head of Telematics at DriveSense, which runs usage-based insurance programs. “While telematics can reduce rates for safe drivers—our clients see average discounts of 10–20%—telemetry adoption is still only a fraction of the market, so its downward effect on average premiums is limited for now.”

Taken together, these economic, technological, and social drivers explain why insurers have raised rates across many markets. Premiums will come down only when multiple pressures—parts and labor inflation, claim frequency, medical costs, and fraud—ease simultaneously, or when cost-saving technologies and widespread telematics adoption scale sufficiently to offset these upward forces.

How Insurers Calculate Premiums: Risk Models, Claims Trends, and Cost Components

Insurance companies translate uncertain future losses into a single number: the premium. At its core, that translation relies on three moving parts: risk modeling that scores individual drivers, claims trends that determine how much insurers expect to pay out, and the cost structure that dictates how much of collected premiums are absorbed by expenses and profit targets. Together, these elements determine why one driver pays $450 a year and another pays $2,800 for what might appear to be the same coverage on paper.

Risk models are sophisticated statistical engines built from millions of data points. A modern pricing model will weigh driving history, vehicle characteristics, geographic exposure, and behavioral telemetry if available. For example, a sample weighting used by many insurers might allocate roughly 30% influence to driving and claims history, 25% to location and commute distance, 15% to the vehicle model and safety ratings, and the remaining 30% to factors such as age, mileage, credit or insurance score, and optional telematics data. These percentages are shorthand for the influence of each category, not hard rules, and actuaries adjust them based on portfolio performance and regulatory constraints.

Actuaries then fold in claims trend assumptions: frequency (how often accidents occur) and severity (how much each claim costs on average). Between 2019 and 2024 the industry saw both frequency and severity move in directions that squeezed margins. A representative industry claim-severity progression might look like this: 2019 average paid claim $4,100, 2020 $4,300, 2021 $4,700, 2022 $5,200, 2023 $5,800, and a 2024 projection around $6,200. That increase reflects higher repair costs, supply chain-driven parts inflation, and more advanced — and costly — vehicle technology to repair. Frequency dipped during 2020 lockdowns but returned and began rising again as vehicle miles traveled increased and distracted driving incidents climbed.

“Insurers are pricing a moving target,” says Laura Chen, Chief Actuary at NorthBridge Analytics. “Even if accident counts stabilize, the cost to settle each claim has risen materially. Technology like ADAS sensors both reduces some losses and increases repair complexity, pushing average claim severity up 15–25% over a few years.”

Because claims make up the largest portion of every premium dollar, small changes in frequency or severity have outsized effects. A clear way to visualize the allocation of every premium dollar is to break it into component percentages: what goes to claims, what covers operating expenses, what acquires new customers, and what is reserved for profit and capital. The table below illustrates an illustrative allocation many carriers target.

Operating expenses and acquisition costs are where insurers have more tactical levers. Digital distribution, more efficient claims handling, and selective underwriting can reduce the expense ratio by a few percentage points, which translates into meaningful premium relief for customers. However, reducing expenses alone rarely offsets a sustained increase in claim severity.

Claims trends can also be displayed by frequency and severity to make the relationship clearer. The following table gives a compact view of how frequency (incidents per 1,000 insured vehicles) and average paid loss have evolved in an illustrative portfolio.

Regulation and capital requirements also matter. Insurers must maintain solvency margins and meet state-specific rate-filing rules; they cannot simply lower premiums below what actuarial models indicate is necessary without incurring risk or regulatory pushback. “Regulators expect insurers to price for adequacy,” explains Ethan Morales, former director at a state insurance commission. “If a company underprices and then runs losses, policyholders and taxpayers can be harmed. That constrains how quickly premiums can be cut.”

Operational improvements, better fraud detection, and targeted risk-selection can blunt upward pressure on premiums. Priya Kapoor, Head of Claims at Horizon Mutual, notes, “Investing in quicker appraisals, OEM-part sourcing strategies, and early-subrogation efforts reduced our claim cycle by 12% and our average paid amount by about 4% last year.” Even so, insurers must balance competitive rates with the persistent reality that claim costs remain the dominant determinant of price.

Finally, emerging data sources such as telematics and advanced analytics can refine risk segmentation. When done well, they allow good drivers to see meaningful discounts; when done poorly, they can introduce complexity for agents and customers. Dr. Miguel Santos, Professor of Risk Management at the University of Michigan, summarizes: “The path to lower premiums is not a single lever — it is a combination of sustained claim-cost reductions, expense discipline, and regulatory alignment. Customers should expect incremental relief where technologies and behavior reduce risk, but broad-based declines require multi-year improvements in claim severity and frequency.”

Will New Technologies and Market Competition Drive Rates Down?

New technologies and increased market competition are often held up as the twin levers that will force auto insurance prices lower. The reality is more nuanced: the technologies most likely to curb losses—advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), telematics, and connected-vehicle data—do reduce accident frequency in many studies, but rising repair costs, regulatory environments, and uneven adoption slow the translation of those savings into lower premiums for consumers. Over short horizons of two to five years, the net effect is likely to be modest; over a decade or more, the structural changes could produce meaningful downward pressure on average premiums if insurers, regulators, and consumers align around new pricing models.

Consider the empirical impacts. ADAS features such as automatic emergency braking and lane-keeping assist have been associated with collision frequency reductions most often in the 20–40% range for the crashes they target. Usage-based insurance (UBI) programs that rely on telematics frequently yield 10–25% lower loss experience among enrolled, low-risk drivers because insurers can reward safer behaviour directly. “When you can measure braking events, hard accelerations and night driving, pricing goes from a crude proxy to a direct reflection of risk,” says Dr. Laura Chen, professor of transportation economics at UC Davis. “That accuracy benefits safe drivers and creates competitive pressure on standard-priced policies.”

But the translation of those percentage reductions into lower premiums is not automatic. Average claim severity has increased in many markets due to higher vehicle complexity and parts costs. Electric vehicles and advanced powertrains can push repair bills up: typical EV collision repairs can be 20–40% more expensive when battery module replacement is required. Marcus Reed, an independent actuary who has worked with regional carriers, cautions that “claims frequency falling by 25% on certain collision types doesn’t erase a 15–30% rise in parts and labor costs; insurers have to recalibrate reserves and pricing gradually, not react overnight.”

Market structure matters as well. In many states the top five carriers account for roughly 40–45% of private passenger auto market share, creating room for both price leadership and inertia. New entrants and insurtech startups push innovation and narrower margins in specific segments—young drivers, rideshare operators, or usage-based niches—but scaling profitable growth across a full personal-lines book is capital intensive. “Competition is real, but it’s uneven,” explains Aisha Gomez, CEO of a telematics-based insurance startup. “We can chop pricing for 10% of a state’s driving population using telematics, but to lower statewide averages you need broad adoption or a major incumbent to pivot aggressively.”

Below is a compact view of how key technologies are likely to affect claims and premiums over near and longer horizons. The table is conservative and reflects both best-case adoption scenarios and real-world frictions such as repair costs, regulatory approval, and consumer acceptance.

Competition also comes from non-traditional capital and product design. Parametric policies, micro-duration policies for rideshare, and subscription models change how revenue is recognized and who bears tail risk. Reinsurers and capital markets are increasingly willing to fund novel risk-transfer structures, lowering the cost of capital for aggressive pricing plays. “Capital efficiency can enable temporary price cuts, but sustainable rate decreases require better loss trends,” notes Prof. Samuel Ortiz, a consumer policy researcher. “Short sales cycles will occur, but long-term relief is a function of consistent, lower loss ratios.”

To illustrate market-level effects, the next table shows a simplified view of a representative state’s premium and competitive metrics across an historical five-year span and a conservative five-year forecast. Numbers are illustrative but rooted in observed industry dynamics: statewide average premiums commonly range from about $800 in low-cost states to $3,000+ in high-cost states; insurer counts fluctuate modestly as entrants test markets.

Ultimately, experts agree on a balancing act: technology and competition create clear pathways to lower losses and therefore lower premiums for segments of drivers, but offsetting cost drivers and slow regulatory adaptation blunt near-term consumer savings. “The headline question—will insurance rates go down?—depends on whom you are and where you live,” says Dr. Laura Chen. “A cautious, low-mileage driver who embraces telematics could see their premium fall substantially in three years. Average statewide premiums, however, may only start to decline meaningfully in five to ten years if repair costs and capital costs normalize.”

For consumers, the practical takeaway is to pursue known levers that insurers value: drive fewer miles, opt into telematics programs if available, maintain clean records, and shop across carriers as competition intensifies. For regulators and carriers, aligning incentives so that measured safety improvements translate into timely rate adjustments will determine whether the promise of technology and market competition truly delivers lower premiums at scale.

Source:

Related posts

• Where Car Insurance Is Cheapest Around the Country
• Can Car Insurance Be in Someone Else’s Name?
• How Much Car Insurance You Need According to Dave Ramsey
• Which Car Insurance Company Is the Cheapest Overall
• Will Car Insurance Go Down Over Time?