What Experienced Brokers Ask to Secure Better Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance Pricing

Content Pillar: Broker Selection, Placement Strategies & Market Dynamics
Context: Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance — United States focus (New York, San Francisco Bay Area, Chicago, Dallas)

Experienced brokers know that better answers produce better pricing. Underwriting for D&O is intensely data-driven: carriers price on exposure, controls, governance, claim history, and market dynamics. Below is a practical, actionable guide to the exact questions seasoned brokers ask — why they ask them, what precise answers move the dial, and how you should prepare (with realistic U.S. pricing ranges and real-carrier examples).

Why the broker's questions matter

Underwriters are buying a story: the clearer, more credible, and better-documented that story, the lower the perceived risk — and the lower the premium. Brokers translate your story into a placement strategy (primary limits, excess towers, attachment points, carriers targeted). Skilled brokers use competition, timing, and narrative to convert underwriting appetite into price and capacity.

  • Better information = less perceived ambiguity = tighter terms.
  • Right broker strategy = access to carriers like Chubb, AIG, Travelers, and Liberty Mutual at competitive pricing.
  • Market context matters: capacity and pricing differ across hubs (NYC vs. SF vs. Chicago vs. Dallas).

The 15 questions experienced brokers ask (and the answer that improves pricing)

1) What is your current corporate structure and revenue trend?

Why: Size and growth signal scale and future risk.
What underwriters like to hear: stable or growing revenue, clear subsidiaries and less cross-border complexity.
Impact: A private company with $10–50M revenue typically sees lower mid-market D&O rates than a $500M firm with complex international subsidiaries.

2) Are you publicly traded, private, or nonprofit? Any plans to IPO/raise capital?

Why: Public companies face higher securities-related exposures.
Good answer: No near-term IPO or a well-documented IPO timeline with risk controls.
Pricing example: private companies often pay $3k–$25k for a $1M primary D&O policy; small public companies may see $100k+ for similar limits (see industry reports below).

3) Who sits on your board? Composition, independence, and expertise?

Why: Governance quality matters as much as financials.
What helps pricing: majority independent directors, audit/compensation committees, documented board charters.

4) Describe loss history and pending litigation.

Why: Recent or frequent claims materially raise rates.
Preferred answer: minimal or old, resolved claims and strong remediation actions.

5) What are your regulatory exposures (SEC, DOJ, state regulators)?

Why: Regulatory investigations drive large D&O losses.
Underwriter preference: proactive compliance programs and recent third-party audits.

6) Do you have internal controls, audit reports, and a robust risk-management program?

Why: Controls lower systemic exposure.
Evidence: internal control reports, SOC 1/2, external audits.

7) What is your cyber/security posture and incident response process?

Why: Securities litigation tied to cyber incidents is a key driver of D&O claims.
Helpful proof: incident response plan, breach history disclosures, cybersecurity insurance layers.

8) Employee class actions or HR exposure?

Why: Employment practices risk cascades into D&O claims.
Positive sign: regular HR audits, anti-discrimination training, clear policies.

9) M&A activity or prior M&A claims?

Why: M&A increases representation & warranty and post-close exposures.
If active: provide detailed diligence and indemnity structures.

10) Financial volatility: EBITDA, leverage, off-balance-sheet exposure?

Why: Financial instability prompts securities claims.
Solid answers: conservative leverage, solid covenant compliance.

11) Cap table complexity and investor profile (VC/PE, sovereign, foreign)?

Why: Sophisticated investors may demand higher limits and can influence litigation likelihood.
Helpful: clear cap table and lead investor support.

12) Do you have indemnification agreements and director advancement provisions?

Why: These arrangements reduce carrier losses.
Positive: strong indemnification and company-side advancement policies.

13) How is communication & disclosure handled with stakeholders?

Why: Poor disclosure creates securities risk.
Best practice: controlled disclosure process, trained spokespeople.

14) What limits and retentions do you want — and why?

Why: It shapes tower structure and premium.
Experienced brokers negotiate attachment points and multi-carrier towers to optimize price/capacity tradeoffs.

15) Timing — when is your renewal or financing event?

Why: Market timing influences leverage.
Seasonality matters; experienced brokers may market earlier to create competition and capture capacity.

How answers translate to pricing — practical U.S. examples (city-specific)

Below are indicative market examples (U.S. markets: New York City, San Francisco Bay Area, Chicago, Dallas). These are representative ranges; actual quotes vary by carrier, class of business, and time. Sources: market reports and broker commentary (see links at end).

Company profile Typical primary limit Typical U.S. premium range (annual) Likely carrier examples
Early-stage private (<$10M revenue, strong controls) $1M $3,000 – $10,000 Chubb, Travelers
Established private middle-market ($50M–$250M) $1M–$5M $25,000 – $150,000 AIG, Liberty Mutual, Chubb
Small public / small-cap ($250M–$1B market cap) $5M–$10M $150,000 – $600,000+ AIG, XL Catlin, Chubb
High-risk industry / active litigation $1M–$5M $50,000 – $500,000+ Carrier-dependent, higher retentions likely

Notes:

  • Carriers such as Chubb, AIG, Travelers, and Liberty Mutual remain active and competitive in U.S. D&O.
  • Market conditions can push excess tower pricing and lead to higher retentions; brokers mitigate via multi-carrier towers or alternate structures.
  • See market insights from Marsh and Aon for national averages and trend data.

What brokers do differently (placement tactics that lower price)

  • Build a crisp, underwriter-ready narrative supported by documents (financials, board minutes, cyber reports).
  • Pre-market with a tailored RFP to selective carriers instead of a shotgun approach.
  • Use competitive tension: running parallel bids and staggered deadlines.
  • Structure towers: combine a strong primary with multiple excess carriers to secure capacity at better blended pricing.
  • Time the market: avoid peak hard-market windows; place earlier than renewal if capacity is tight.

See related strategy guidance: Placement Strategies That Win Capacity: Techniques Brokers Use for Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance.

Quick checklist for a broker-ready D&O package (what to have before you talk)

  • Last 3 years financial statements and QTR interim results
  • Cap table and subsidiary list (incl. foreign entities)
  • Board bios and committee charters
  • Loss run and litigation schedule (last 5–7 years)
  • Recent compliance and SOC/audit reports
  • Cybersecurity posture summary and incident history
  • M&A activity and press releases
  • Desired limits, retentions, and key endorsements

For detailed RFP preparation: How to Prepare an Effective RFP for Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance Renewals.

Common red flags that increase D&O pricing

  • Recent regulatory investigation or securities litigation
  • Significant revenue declines or covenant breaches
  • Board composition with frequent turnover or related-party directors
  • Repeated cyber incidents or insufficient cyber controls
  • Rapid M&A activity without indemnity protections

Avoid placement pitfalls by reviewing: Placement Pitfalls: Common Mistakes That Weaken Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance Programs.

Final practical tips (city-specific considerations)

  • New York City: expect higher competing demand from financial services firms; well-documented governance can unlock access to larger carriers.
  • San Francisco Bay Area: cybersecurity and tech disclosure risk dominate — strengthen IR and cyber controls to lower premiums.
  • Chicago & Dallas: regional carriers are competitive on mid-market placements; use local broker relationships to access regional appetite.

Sources and further reading

  • Marsh — Management Liability / D&O market commentary and reports: https://www.marsh.com (review Marsh D&O market summaries for trends and averages)
  • Aon — Global and U.S. D&O market insights: https://www.aon.com (see Aon management liability insights for underwriting trends)
  • Industry reporting on D&O pricing & market dynamics: S&P Global Market Intelligence (search D&O insurance market articles)

(Note: Carrier pricing varies by risk, limits, and market. Use the checklist above to gather materials for your broker — well-prepared submissions materially improve quotes from carriers like Chubb, AIG, Travelers, and Liberty Mutual in U.S. hubs such as New York, San Francisco, Chicago, and Dallas.)

Recommended Articles