What Does Primary and Non Contributory Mean in Insurance

Table of Contents

What Does Primary and Non-Contributory Mean in Insurance

Insurance language can be confusing, especially when contracts require a policy to be “primary and non-contributory.” These two short terms carry significant legal and financial implications. In this article you’ll find clear definitions, real-world examples, sample financial figures, and practical guidance to help you understand what these clauses mean for policyholders, additional insureds, brokers, and claims handlers.

Plain-English Definitions

Start with the basics. There are two different meanings you need to keep separate because “non-contributory” is used in more than one context.

Primary: When a policy is designated as “primary,” it means that if a loss occurs the primary policy pays first. Other valid insurance that could respond will only pay after the primary policy has paid up to its limits.

Non-Contributory (liability endorsement context): In liability policy endorsements (commonly used when listing an Additional Insured), “non-contributory” means the insurer will not seek contribution from any other valid and collectible insurance that the Additional Insured might have. In other words, the primary policy will not demand the other insurer share payment.

Non-Contributory (employee benefits context): Separately, in employee benefit plans, “non-contributory” means the employer pays the entire premium and employees contribute nothing. This is unrelated to the primary/excess order of coverage but is a common alternative meaning you should be aware of.

Why These Clauses Matter

Contractual language requiring a policy to be “primary and non-contributory” often appears in construction contracts, leases, vendor agreements, and subcontracts. The entity requesting the clause (often an owner or general contractor) wants to protect itself from having to contribute to defense or indemnity costs when a claim arises tied to the subcontractor’s work.

For the party being asked to add the clause—the subcontractor or vendor—agreeing can increase their risk exposure and sometimes the cost of insurance. Still, it is often a non-negotiable condition of doing business on many projects.

How Payment Works: A Simple Example

Here is a plain example with numbers to show how a primary and non-contributory clause changes the way a claim is paid.

Scenario: A subcontractor’s negligence causes $400,000 in third-party property damage. The subcontractor has a $1,000,000 general liability policy. The general contractor (GC) also has a $2,000,000 general liability policy.

If subcontractor’s policy is primary and non-contributory: the subcontractor’s insurer pays up to the subcontractor’s policy limits (here $400,000 would be paid entirely by the subcontractor’s insurer). The GC’s insurer does not contribute, and will only respond if the subcontractor’s limit is exhausted and there is remaining loss above that limit, depending on policy language and whether the GC’s insurer is required to provide excess coverage.
If subcontractor’s policy is primary but contributory: the subcontractor’s insurer pays first, but the GC’s insurer might be able to contribute to costs, or the subcontractor’s insurer might seek contribution from the GC’s insurer (rare but possible depending on wording of other policies and state law).
If there is no primary designation: both insurers could potentially argue over who pays (pro rata, pro tanto, or based on other-insurance clauses), resulting in delays and legal expense.

Claim Allocation Table: Primary vs Shared Contribution

Scenario	Total Loss	Subcontractor Policy Limit	GC Policy Limit	Payment by Subcontractor Insurer	Payment by GC Insurer
Primary + Non-Contributory	$400,000	$1,000,000	$2,000,000	$400,000	$0
Primary, but Contribution Valid	$1,500,000	$1,000,000	$2,000,000	$1,000,000	$500,000
No Primary Clause (other insurance dispute)	$400,000	$1,000,000	$2,000,000	$200,000* (example pro rata)	$200,000*

*Numbers in the “No Primary Clause” row are illustrative: actual allocation depends on other-insurance clauses and governing law. Pro rata here divides payment proportionally based on policy limits: $400k total; total available limits = $3,000,000; subcontractor pays (1,000,000/3,000,000)*400,000 ≈ $133,333 and GC pays (2,000,000/3,000,000)*400,000 ≈ $266,667. Different methods may apply.

Different Uses of “Non-Contributory” (Clear Distinction)

It’s important to distinguish two common contexts where “non-contributory” appears:

Liability Endorsements for Additional Insureds: A business (usually an owner or GC) requests that a subcontractor add the business as an Additional Insured under the subcontractor’s policy and make that coverage “primary and non-contributory”. This protects the Added Insured from having to use its own policy as primary for defense or indemnity.
Employee Benefit Plans: “Non-contributory” can mean the employer pays 100% of insurance premiums (e.g., non-contributory life insurance for employees). This is a different meaning and has nothing to do with order of coverage.

If you see the phrase in a contract or Certificate of Insurance (COI), confirm the context. Ask whether the intent is ordering of liability coverage or indicating who pays premiums.

Why Requestors Ask for Primary and Non-Contributory Coverage

Owners, general contractors, and property managers ask for this clause for several reasons:

To avoid having their own insurance triggered and possibly affecting their loss history and insurance premiums.
To ensure defense and indemnity is funded immediately by the party causing the loss (the subcontractor or vendor), avoiding delays while insurers fight over who pays.
To place the risk responsibility squarely on the contracting party who is performing the work that could create liability.

From a risk-transfer perspective, the request makes sense: it moves the financial burden to the party whose insurance is directly tied to the work being performed.

Financial Impact: How Much Does It Cost to Add This Clause?

Adding an Additional Insured endorsement and stipulating “primary and non-contributory” can increase a contractor’s insurance cost. The exact amount varies by industry, size of the insured, claims history, and insurer appetite. Here are realistic example figures to show how premiums change in practical terms.

Example Business	Base GL Premium	Additional Insured Endorsement	Primary & Non-Contributory Endorsement	Total Estimated Premium
Small Subcontractor (Specialty trade)	$10,000	$500 (5%)	$750 (7.5%)	$11,250
Mid-size Contractor	$35,000	$1,750 (5%)	$3,150 (9%)	$39,900
Large Contractor	$150,000	$7,500 (5%)	$15,000 (10%)	$172,500

Notes:

Percentages and fees above are illustrative. Some carriers include Additional Insureds with no separate charge but will adjust rates over time based on exposure.
Premiums can jump higher when the requested non-contributory clause creates exposure to large losses that otherwise the requestor’s own policy would cover.
Insurance markets, jurisdictional law, and underwriting guidelines cause wide variance in pricing.

How a Typical Dispute Plays Out: Timeline and Dollars

Here’s a typical sequence when a claim occurs and a primary/non-contributory clause is in play.

Incident occurs (day 0). Third party suffers injury or property damage and files a claim.
Claim notice is given to the subcontractor’s insurer and the GC or owner (if they were additional insureds).
Subcontractor’s insurer accepts coverage if liability is within policy terms and tends to immediately provide defense to the additional insured because of the endorsement language. This avoids immediate use of GC’s own policy or reserves.
Payments are made out of subcontractor’s policy limits. If the loss exhausts those limits, the additional insured may turn to their own excess policies.
If the clause was not in place, the GC’s insurer may be asked to pay first or both insurers may dispute contribution; this can delay settlement and increase defense costs—often tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees on large claims.

Example with numbers: a $1.2 million claim with subcontractor policy limits of $1 million. Under primary and non-contributory, subcontractor insurer pays $1 million and GC’s excess responds for the remaining $200,000. No contribution sought from GC’s primary $2 million policy. Without the clause, the GC’s insurer might pay $1,200,000 up front and later seek contribution from subcontractor’s insurer through subrogation or litigation—complex and time consuming.

Pros and Cons of Agreeing to Primary and Non-Contributory Requirements

For the party who must add the clause (often the subcontractor):

Pros:
- Completes contract requirements and wins work.
- May avoid contract disputes and breach of contract claims.
Cons:
- Places greater immediate financial exposure on your policy for claims where you may not be primarily at fault.
- Can lead to increased premiums and loss experience impacts.
- May limit ability to seek contribution from other insurers, depending on endorsement language.

For the party requesting the clause (owner, GC):

Pros:
- Protects their own insurance and loss history.
- Reduces delay in defense and indemnity funding.
Cons:
- Less ability to use their own policy to control defense strategy when they might want to.
- Policy language must be carefully read to ensure full protection—endorsement wording matters a lot.

Common Endorsement Wording and What to Watch For

Endorsement wording varies by carrier. Typical language you may see includes phrases like:

“The insurance afforded to the Additional Insured shall be primary and non-contributory to any other insurance available to the Additional Insured.”
“This insurance shall be primary to any policies of liability insurance maintained by the Additional Insured.”

Important things to check:

Does the endorsement apply only to defense, only to indemnity, or to both?
Does it apply for claims arising out of the named insured’s work only, or is it broader?
Is it limited by time, location, or certain operations?
Does the endorsement contain any carve-outs or conditions such as “where required by written contract”—and if so, does the contract satisfy those conditions?

Negotiating Alternatives and Protective Language

If you are asked to accept primary and non-contributory status, consider negotiating something more protective. Some alternatives include:

Limiting the endorsement to specific contracts, job sites, or periods of exposure.
Limiting the endorsement to “primary for liability arising out of the named insured’s operations only,” which narrows exposure.
Requesting a “waiver of subrogation” instead of non-contributory—this prevents the insurer from suing the additional insured after paying a claim but doesn’t force the insurer to pay first.
Establishing a buyout: the additional insured can purchase its own insurance or pay higher limits on a primary policy rather than relying on the subcontractor’s coverage.
Asking for a contract clause that requires the requestor to “indemnify and hold harmless” the subcontractor for claims arising out of the requestor’s own negligence—this can balance exposures.

Practical Checklist for Brokers and Policyholders

If you’re a broker, policyholder, or risk manager, use this checklist when faced with a primary and non-contributory request:

Confirm the exact requested wording and the contract provision requiring it.
Confirm whether the requestor specifically needs “primary and non-contributory” or only “additional insured” status.
Get a copy of the underlying contract and scope of work.
Obtain insurer approval: underwriters need to review and often charge additional premium.
Evaluate the financial impact: ask insurers for a quote showing the difference in total premium and aggregation of exposures.
Consider negotiating limits or wording to limit exposure (time, project, operations).
Document acceptance in writing and issue a Certificate of Insurance and endorsement copies showing the agreed language.

Sample Contract Clauses and What They Really Mean

Here are sample clauses you might see and a translation to plain English.

Clause: “Subcontractor shall provide Commercial General Liability insurance naming Contractor as Additional Insured, and coverage shall be primary and non-contributory to any other insurance available to Contractor.”
Plain English: If there’s a claim related to the subcontractor’s work, the subcontractor’s insurer pays first and will not ask the contractor’s insurer to contribute.
Clause: “Insurance required herein is primary and non-contributory only to the extent caused by the work performed by Subcontractor.”
Plain English: The endorsement applies only where the subcontractor’s work is the cause of the loss—not for independent acts of the contractor or others.
Clause: “Vendor shall provide insurance on a primary and non-contributory basis unless such insurance is provided by the Vendor’s insurer as excess to the Client’s policy.”
Plain English: This is confusing; clarify with both parties. It could mean the vendor’s policy is primary except where the vendor’s insurer already provides coverage that sits excess to the client’s policy—get clear agreement before signing.

Legal and Jurisdictional Considerations

Different states and countries have varied rules on “other insurance” clauses, contribution, and how courts interpret primary/non-contributory endorsements. Some jurisdictions strictly enforce endorsement language; others may allow equitable contribution or examine the substance of coverage rather than the label.

For this reason:

Always consult local counsel when large exposures or disputes arise.
Review prior case law in your jurisdiction about enforceability of non-contributory endorsements and additional insured status.

When Things Go Wrong: Common Disputes

Some frequent disputes include:

Disagreement over whether the endorsement was actually effective (was it correctly issued, attached, and supported by the contract?).
Debate about the scope—does the endorsement cover both defense and indemnity or only defense?
Conflict when multiple policies each claim the other should pay first (other-insurance disputes), especially when wording is inconsistent.
Failed communication—claims are delayed because carriers argue over obligations, increasing defense costs.

Best Practices to Avoid Disputes

To minimize conflict and expense:

Ensure endorsements are issued promptly and match contractual wording exactly.
Maintain clear documentation: contracts, COIs, and endorsements stored in a centralized system.
Communicate proactively with all insurers when contracts require primary/non-contributory status.
Buy appropriate limits if you are the party requesting the clause—having adequate excess or umbrella limits reduces the risk you will be underinsured despite primary clauses.

FAQ: Quick Answers

Q: Does “primary and non-contributory” mean the additional insured cannot use its own insurance?
A: No. It means the additional insured’s own policy is not expected to contribute while the primary insurer pays. The additional insured still has its own insurance and may use it if the primary limit is exhausted or if the contract/endorsement allows.

Q: Will my insurer agree to non-contributory status?
A: Many insurers will agree, but often with conditions: additional premium, restrictions on operations, or limits to specific contracts. Underwriters evaluate increased exposure and price accordingly.

Q: Is “non-contributory” the same as “waiver of subrogation”?
A: No. A waiver of subrogation prevents an insurer from pursuing the additional insured after paying a claim; non-contributory means the insurer will not require the additional insured’s insurance to contribute to the loss. Both can appear together in contracts.

Q: If my policy says “primary” but not “non-contributory,” what happens?
A: The policy will be expected to pay first, but the insurer might still try to seek contribution from other insurers depending on other-insurance clauses and jurisdiction. “Primary” alone does not necessarily prevent contribution.

Summary and Final Advice

“Primary and non-contributory” are powerful contractual tools to control who pays when losses occur. For project owners and general contractors, they protect loss history and ensure funding for defense and indemnity. For subcontractors and vendors, they shift more immediate financial exposure onto their insurance policies.

Before agreeing to such clauses, do the following:

Read your contract carefully—understand the exact obligations.
Talk to your broker and insurer early. Get clear, written confirmation that the insurer will issue the endorsement and quote any premium impact.
Consider negotiating limits to the endorsement or alternative risk-transfer mechanisms if the cost is prohibitive.
Document everything and ensure endorsements are attached to the policy and certificates reflect the agreed language.

Primary and non-contributory language can be beneficial or burdensome depending on your role in a transaction. When in doubt, consult legal counsel and your insurance broker so you know the financial and contractual consequences before signing on the dotted line.

Source: