Side A Limits and Personal Asset Protection for Fund Managers in Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance

Directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance is critical for fund managers — private equity, hedge funds, venture funds and other investment advisers — because regulatory enforcement, investor litigation and creditor actions can target personal assets. In the USA, Side A limits are specifically designed to protect individual executives when a company cannot indemnify them (bankruptcy, conflicts, insolvency, or indemnification restrictions). This article explains how Side A works, how fund managers should buy it in U.S. financial centers (New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Miami), pricing examples from leading carriers, and practical negotiation and governance measures to maximize personal asset protection.

What is Side A coverage and why fund managers need it

  • Side A (Direct) coverage pays on behalf of individual directors and officers when the entity cannot or will not indemnify them.
  • For fund managers, typical triggers include:
    • Regulatory enforcement by SEC, DOJ, state regulators
    • Investor derivative suits or class claims
    • Insolvency of a fund or management company
    • Contractual indemnity limitations (LPAs, side letters)
  • Side A is often sold as:
    • Standalone Side A-only policy (commonly purchased by private equity and hedge funds), or
    • Side A Difference in Conditions (DIC) attached to a broader D&O tower, or
    • As part of a corporate D&O program (Sides A, B, C).

Fund managers operating in high‑risk U.S. markets — New York (SEC and state AG activity), San Francisco (VC/tech disputes), Miami (crypto/wealth management growth), Chicago (institutional investors) — should assume a realistic probability of personal exposure and budget for Side A protection proactively.

How Side A sits in a D&O tower: quick comparison

Feature Side A-only Side A DIC Full D&O (Sides A/B/C)
Protects personal assets when indemnity unavailable Yes (primary purpose) Yes (broader application) Yes (but budget shared)
Pays if company bankrupt or refuses indemnity Yes Yes Yes, but may be subject to allocation disputes
Typical buyers (funds) Small-to-mid managers, GP-only programs Mid-to-large funds seeking higher personal protection Corporate-backed funds and larger firms
Typical limit range (U.S. funds) $2M – $25M+ $5M – $50M+ $5M – $100M+
Cost sensitivity Lower capacity but often cost-efficient Higher cost than standalone Side A Typically most expensive overall

Key structural choices for fund managers in the USA

  • Limit sizing: Many U.S. fund managers buy $5M–$25M Side A limits as a baseline; larger GPs or managers with public profiles commonly buy $25M–$50M+. Secondary layers can scale to $100M+ for very large firms.
  • Attachment and priority: Side A DIC should be primary and non-contributory when purchased to avoid allocation fights with corporate indemnity.
  • Run-off and tail: For private funds, consider extended reporting or run-off terms (6–7 years or claimant-friendly extended reporting periods) if the GP could face claims years after fund wind-down.
  • Excess and allocation wording: Clarify allocation between corporate vs. individual loss and define insured versus non‑insured loss to reduce suits over coverage.

Pricing — U.S. market realities and carrier examples

Pricing for Side A and D&O for fund managers varies by AUM, strategy, regulatory exposures, and claims history. Below are illustrative U.S.-market ranges and examples from well-known carriers and market commentary. (Actual quotes require broker submission and underwriting.)

  • Typical annual premium ranges by AUM/scale (U.S. fund manager examples):

    • Emerging/smaller managers (<$500M AUM): $15,000 – $60,000 for $5M Side A-only.
    • Mid-sized managers ($500M–$5B AUM): $50,000 – $250,000 for $10M–$25M limits.
    • Large managers (>$5B AUM or high-profile): $250,000 – $1,000,000+ for $25M–$50M+ limits and layered programs.
  • Carrier examples (indicative presence and positioning in U.S. fund market):

    • AIG — active in financial institutions D&O; often offers tailored Side A DIC wording and higher capacity for large funds.
    • Chubb — known for strong Side A-only products aimed at alternative asset managers and private equity GPs.
    • AXA XL — competes on capacity and structured towers for multi-layer D&O programs.
    • Zurich / Travelers / Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance — provide market capacity and specialty underwriting for fund managers.

Market sources note that pricing and availability tightened in recent cycles due to regulatory enforcement and private litigation trends — working with a broker (Aon, Marsh, Willis Towers Watson) remains critical for competitive pricing and carrier selection. See market commentary from Investopedia on D&O and professional broker market analysis for trends and pricing context:

(For accurate, up-to-date quotes contact carriers or a broker — examples above are representative; underwriting detail will materially affect premium.)

Negotiation levers: wording and underwriting to maximize personal protection

Fund managers should insist on:

  • Primary Side A DIC wording that is non-contributory and erodes only after defense/settlement payment.
  • Insured vs. non‑insured loss clarity and broad definitions for “loss,” including civil fines and penalties where insurable.
  • Severability and co-insured definitions to avoid declination for statements by one insured impacting others.
  • Extradition or regulatory coverage enhancements for cross-border exposures if manager operates internationally.
  • Run-off and extended reporting options for closed funds or successor managers.

Underwriting items to prepare to secure better terms:

  • Clean claims history, robust governance materials (conflicts policy, AML, trading controls).
  • Strong compliance program evidence (esp. for managers in New York and San Francisco where enforcement is active).
  • Transparent LP agreements and side letters to demonstrate indemnity exposures.

For governance best practices tied to insurance purchasing, see: Best Practices for Funds: Governance, Reporting and D&O Insurance to Reduce Regulatory Exposure.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

  • Relying solely on corporate indemnity: LPAs and insolvency can leave individuals exposed — secure standalone Side A protection.
  • Buying insufficient limits: High-profile enforcement or multi-plaintiff suits can exhaust small limits quickly.
  • Ignoring allocation wording: Coverage fights often arise over allocation between entity and individual claims — get clear allocation language.
  • Overlooking broker placement strategy: Different carriers specialize in fund manager risks — multi-broker sourcing can improve capacity.

For deeper coverage of fund-specific D&O tailoring see: Private Equity and Hedge Funds: Tailoring Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance for Fund Managers.

Claims handling and regulator-driven investigations

Regulator-driven investigations (SEC/DOJ/state AGs) carry nuanced claims handling implications for Side A. If a regulator seeks disgorgement or penalties that are non-insurable in some jurisdictions, carriers may contest coverage. That makes precise policy language and early notice to carriers crucial.

For how regulatory risk increases insurance needs, read: Regulatory Scrutiny and D&O: How Enforcement Risk Raises Insurance Needs for Financial Institutions.

Practical checklist for fund managers in New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Miami

  • Determine target Side A limit based on AUM, GP net worth, and public profile.
  • Obtain Side A DIC or standalone Side A quotes from at least 3 carriers (AIG, Chubb, AXA XL, Zurich, Travelers).
  • Secure non-contributory primary wording and extended reporting where fund wind-down is expected.
  • Review indemnification clauses in LPAs and side letters; remove or negotiate indemnity caps where possible.
  • Maintain and document compliance controls (AML, trade surveillance, reporting) to favor pricing and renewal terms.

Conclusion

Side A limits are the primary line of defense for personal asset protection for fund managers in the USA. Given active regulators and increased investor litigation, fund managers — especially in New York, San Francisco, Chicago and Miami — should proactively secure meaningful Side A capacity, negotiate precise non‑contributory wording, and integrate insurance strategy with governance reforms. Work with experienced brokers and underwriters (e.g., AIG, Chubb, AXA XL, Zurich) to get tailored quotes and best-in-class wording that reflects the unique exposures of private funds.

External references and further reading:

Internal resources:

Recommended Articles