on Insurance Uncategorized

Naming Charities as Policy Beneficiaries: Legal, Tax, and Practical Considerations

High net worth (HNW) estate planning frequently uses life insurance to fund charitable intentions while preserving wealth for heirs. Naming charities as beneficiaries of life insurance policies — directly or indirectly through trusts such as Charitable Lead Trusts (CLTs), Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs), or Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs) — involves distinct legal, tax, and operational choices. This article focuses on U.S. federal and state considerations (with examples from New York, California, Texas, and Florida), realistic premium ranges from leading insurers, and practical drafting tips for HNW donors.

Key legal and tax principles (U.S. focus)

  • Ownership vs. beneficiary: Who owns the policy (the insured, an ILIT, the charity, or a trust) determines income-tax deductibility, gift-tax consequences, and whether the proceeds are includible in the insured’s gross estate for estate tax purposes.
  • Estate-tax charitable deduction: If the insured owns the policy at death and names a charity as beneficiary, proceeds paid to the charity generally qualify for an estate tax charitable deduction under IRC §2055. If the insured doesn’t own the policy (e.g., an ILIT owns it), proceeds are typically outside the gross estate.
  • Income tax limits on charitable deductions: Charitable income tax deductions for gifts of life insurance policies or premiums are subject to percentage limits of adjusted gross income (AGI), and excess contributions may carry forward (see IRS guidance on charitable contributions).
  • Gift tax and Form 709: Transferring an existing policy to a charity or trust triggers gift-tax reporting; premium payments to a third-party owner (e.g., ILIT) can be treated as gifts to trust beneficiaries unless structured with Crummey notices or other mechanisms.
  • Generation-skipping and GST tax: When charitable gifts are combined with multigenerational planning, GST and allocation of exemptions must be considered.

Authoritative references:

Common structuring options — pros, cons, and tax effects

Structure How it works Estate tax Income tax deduction Practical considerations
Policy owned by insured, charity named beneficiary Insured owns & pays premiums; charity receives proceeds at death Proceeds in insured’s estate but estate deduction for amounts passing to charity No charitable income deduction for premiums; estate gets deduction Simple; good when estate will be taxable and donor wants immediate estate deduction
Policy owned by ILIT, charity named beneficiary ILIT owns policy; charity or trust receives proceeds Proceeds generally excluded from insured’s estate if transfer-for-value rules satisfied and 3-year rule avoided No immediate deduction for premiums; possible estate planning leverage Requires careful ILIT drafting, Crummey notices, and robust funding vehicle
Policy assigned to charity during life or donated to charity Donor assigns or transfers ownership of policy to charity Removed from estate if fully transferred and conditions met Donor may claim charitable deduction for policy’s fair market value or cost basis (IRC §170) Irrevocable; donors lose control; underwriting/acceptance by charity required
Policy funding a CLT or CRT Policy premiums paid into trust which makes charitable/non-charitable payouts per trust terms Can produce estate-tax efficiency; CLT provides payments to charity during term CLT contributions create charitable deduction at trust funding; CRT may provide income to donor then remainder to charity Complex, requires actuarial valuation and trustee administration; see related trusts links below

Practical considerations by U.S. state (NY, CA, TX, FL examples)

  • New York & California: High state estate tax exposure for large estates requires combining federal planning with state-level strategies. Naming charities as beneficiaries can offset state estate tax liability where a state-level charitable deduction applies.
  • Texas & Florida: No state income tax and no state estate taxes (Florida has no estate tax; Texas no estate/income tax), so federal planning dominates. Insurers and brokerages in these markets often emphasize federal exclusion and GST optimization.
  • Charity acceptance: Not all charities accept policy transfers. Large charities (e.g., United Way, American Red Cross) and community foundations have policies; donor-advised funds (DAFs) with providers such as Fidelity Charitable or Schwab Charitable may accept life insurance in some circumstances.

Pricing realities and insurer examples (HNW use cases)

HNW clients typically use large face amounts, survivorship (second-to-die) policies or universal life (UL)/guaranteed universal life (GUL) structures. Pricing varies by age, health class, product type, and insurer. Below are illustrative ranges (2024 market context). Always obtain firm quotes.

  • Leading mutual insurers frequently used by HNW clients:
  • Illustrative premium ranges (approximate; underwriting-dependent):
    • $10M survivorship GUL for married couple ages 60/58: roughly $50,000–$150,000 annually with top-tier underwriting and depending on product guarantees.
    • $5M single-life GUL for a healthy 55-year-old male: roughly $20,000–$60,000 annually.
    • $5M 10-year term for a healthy 50-year-old male: roughly $6,000–$15,000 annually (term pricing for very large face amounts varies widely).
  • For consumer-oriented premium comparisons and cost context, see Policygenius cost guide: https://www.policygenius.com/life-insurance/life-insurance-cost/

Note: insurers’ product availability and crediting strategies differ by state. Large face amounts may require medical records, APS, and financial justification.

Valuation, reporting, and documentation

  • Valuation for charitable deduction: Donated policies and transfers to trusts require accurate valuation — often using actuarial tables and present-value calculations (see IRS rules on charitable contributions).
  • Reporting: Gifts of existing policies are reported on Form 709 (gift tax returns); estate tax charitable deductions on Form 706. If a charity accepts a policy during the donor’s life, the charity may issue an acknowledgement for deduction substantiation.
  • Three-year rule: If donor transfers a policy to an ILIT within three years of death, the face amount may be pulled back into the estate (IRC §2035) unless certain exceptions apply.

Drafting and administrative best practices

  • Specify beneficiary language clearly: Use full legal name, EIN, and percentage shares (e.g., “The [Charity Name], EIN 12‑3456789, located at [address], as to 50% of the proceeds”).
  • Primary vs. contingent: Name charities as primary if immediate charitable intent is desired; name them as contingent to preserve cash for heirs with charity receiving remainder if heirs predecease.
  • Coordinate ownership and beneficiary designations: Align policy ownership (insured, ILIT, trust) with beneficiary designations to achieve intended estate and income tax consequences.
  • Trust drafting: If using CLTs or CRTs funded with insurance, include trustee powers to adjust investments, accept policy assignments, and manage payouts. Use an experienced estate attorney in your state (NY/CA/TX/FL) for state-law nuances.
  • Charity acceptance checklist: Confirm the charity’s acceptance policy, whether they will be owner or beneficiary, and if they require a premium schedule or underwriting before accepting ownership.

When to use each strategy — illustrative scenarios

  • Use policy owned by insured + charity beneficiary when the donor expects a taxable estate and wants the estate deduction to reduce estate tax.
  • Use ILIT ownership with charity contingent to exclude proceeds from estate and preserve liquidity for heirs while still providing for charity if heirs predecease.
  • Use CLT funded by insurance when the donor wants a current income-tax charitable deduction (for CLT present value) and eventual return of capital to heirs.
  • Use CRT funded by life insurance more rarely; CRTs typically use appreciated assets to generate income and a remainder to charity — pairing with insurance can replace principal to heirs.

Next steps and resources

  • Consult experienced estate planning counsel and a tax advisor licensed in your state (for NY, CA, TX, or FL) before naming charities or transferring policies.
  • Obtain multiple insurer quotes for large face amounts; ask carriers about survivorship design, GUL pricing, and illustration guarantees.
  • Review charitable acceptance policies with intended charities or donor-advised fund sponsors.

Related deep-dive articles from our trust & insurance cluster:

Selected authoritative references

Recommended Articles