on Insurance Uncategorized

Life Insurance vs Gifting: Comparing Income-Tax and Estate-Tax Outcomes for HNW Clients

High-net-worth (HNW) families in the United States commonly choose between making lifetime gifts and using life insurance to accomplish wealth transfer and estate-tax mitigation. Both strategies affect income-tax, gift/estate-tax exposure, liquidity at death, and family control in different ways. This article compares the outcomes of gifting versus life insurance for HNW clients—particularly residents of New York, California, and Florida—so advisors and families can make informed planning choices.

Key U.S. tax rules that drive strategy (2024)

  • Federal gift and estate tax unified lifetime exemption (2024): $13.61 million per individual. Gifts in excess of the annual exclusion ($18,000 per donee in 2024) consume this lifetime exemption and can trigger gift-tax reporting. Source: IRS.[1]
  • Top federal gift/estate tax rate: 40%. That rate applies to taxable transfers above the exemption. Source: IRS.[1]
  • Income-tax treatment: Gifts are not income to recipients (so generally no income tax on received property). Life insurance death benefits are typically income-tax-free to beneficiaries under IRC §101, provided rules are met.
  • State estate taxes vary widely: California and Florida do not have state estate taxes; New York and Massachusetts do, with lower exemptions and different rate schedules—so state residence (or situs of assets) matters for HNW planning.

Sources: IRS estate/gift guidance and life-insurance cost surveys.[1][2][3]

[1] https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/estate-and-gift-tax
[2] https://www.policygenius.com/life-insurance/cost/
[3] https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/insurance/how-much-is-life-insurance

Quick comparison: gifting vs life insurance (high-level)

Feature Lifetime Gifting Life Insurance (Death Benefit)
Income tax to recipient None (generally) None (death benefit generally income-tax-free)
Uses lifetime exemption Yes — reduces remaining exemption No (if structured correctly — e.g., ILIT or third-party ownership)
Immediate removal of asset from estate Yes (if completed gift) Only if policy excluded from insured's estate (e.g., ILIT or third-party owner + no incidents of ownership)
Liquidity at death for estate taxes Only if prior gifting preserved liquid assets Provides immediate liquidity (death benefit)
Gift/transfer reporting Form 709 if above annual exclusion Not treated as a taxable gift if properly owned, but premium gifts to an ILIT may require Crummey notices and Form 709 reporting
Typical buyers (HNW use) Large, irrevocable gifts often used ILIT-funded permanent or private-placement life insurance for HNW

Why HNW clients compare these approaches

  • HNW families frequently have concentrated, illiquid holdings (real estate, business interests, art). Making large lifetime gifts can help reduce a future estate tax bill, but that transfers control and may trigger gift-tax use of unified exemption.
  • If significant estate-tax liability remains at death, life insurance can provide liquidity to pay taxes without forcing sale of family businesses or real estate. See also: How Life Insurance Provides Liquidity at Death to Settle Estate Taxes and Preserve Assets.

Detailed scenarios with numbers (illustrative)

Scenario assumptions (federal rules as of 2024):

  • Couple (joint) estate: $20,000,000
  • Combined available federal exemptions: $27,220,000 (2 × $13.61M) if both estates coordinate
  • For simplicity, consider a single decedent scenario where remaining taxable estate exceeds exemption.

Example A — Lifetime gifts:

  • Suppose the primary transfers $5,000,000 outright today.
  • That uses $5M of lifetime exemption (reducing future exemption).
  • If the decedent’s remaining taxable estate at death still exceeds the remaining exemption, estate tax remains due on the excess — the lifetime gifts reduced estate tax only to the extent the assets are removed from estate and exemption capacity was available.

Example B — Life insurance in an ILIT:

  • Instead of gifting $5M of marketable securities away today, the decedent funds an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) with annual Crummey gifts sufficient to pay policy premiums. The ILIT purchases a $5M death benefit policy owned by the trust; the death benefit is excluded from the insured’s estate if structured correctly (no retained incidents of ownership). The ILIT beneficiaries receive the death proceeds tax-free to pay estate taxes and preserve assets.

Comparative result (illustrative):

  • Federal tax saved by fully transferring $5M out of estate at 40% = up to $2M (but this uses $5M of the $13.61M exemption).
  • An ILIT-funded $5M death benefit provides up to $5M liquidity at death without consuming the donor’s lifetime exemption (if premiums are gift-taxed appropriately), preserving exemption for other transfers.

Note: These are simplified numbers; actual savings depend on timing, step-up in basis issues, and state estate tax rules.

Income-tax considerations (gifts and life-insurance interest/cash value)

  • Gifting appreciated property: donors may avoid future capital-gains tax at death because beneficiaries receive a step-up in basis; if you gift appreciated property during life, the donee takes the donor’s basis (carryover), potentially creating future capital-gains exposure. For clients who want stepped-up basis, they may avoid gifting highly appreciated assets outright.
  • Life insurance cash values (permanent policies): accumulate tax-deferred inside the policy. Policy loans are generally tax-free but can create estate inclusion issues or trigger gain recognition on surrender. See: Avoiding Common Pitfalls: Policy Loans, Surrenders, and Their Impact on Estate Taxes.

Estate-tax mechanics and practical planning tips

  • Estate inclusion rules: life-insurance proceeds are included in the insured’s taxable estate if the insured retains incidents of ownership (e.g., the right to change beneficiaries, borrow, pledge). The classic workaround is ownership by an ILIT or by a third-party with no retained incidents. See: Structuring Life Policies to Minimize Estate Inclusion and Preserve Family Wealth.
  • Gift-tax planning: annual exclusion gifts ($18,000 per donee in 2024) and Crummey powers allow funding ILIT premiums without immediate consumption of lifetime exemption, but Form 709 and careful documentation are required.
  • State estate tax: residents of New York or Massachusetts should consider state-level exposures and plan accordingly. For clients in California or Florida (no state estate tax), federal tax remains primary but state income and transfer taxes differ.

Product choices for HNW clients: companies and pricing landscape

  • Term life (large face amount): online carriers and platforms such as Haven Life (backed by MassMutual) and brokers like Policygenius and NerdWallet show competitive term pricing for $1M–$5M policies for healthy individuals. Example ranges for a healthy 40–50-year-old applying for level-term:
    • $1M 20-year term: roughly $30–$150/month depending on age, health class, and carrier.[2][3]
  • Permanent insurance and PPLI for HNW: major insurers and private placement channels include Prudential, Northwestern Mutual, MassMutual, New York Life, and private-placement solutions through institutional teams (AIG Private Client Group, Prudential Private Placement). Private Placement Life Insurance (PPLI) is commonly used by ultra-HNW clients; typical minimums for PPLI structures often start at $1 million to $5 million of premium or higher, depending on the manager and product. Pricing for permanent policies depends heavily on age, health, structure (single-premium vs scheduled premiums), and investment credits inside the policy.
  • Example real-world marketplace note: a mass-market broker might quote a $5M term policy for a healthy 45-year-old at several hundred dollars per month, whereas a survivorship (second-to-die) permanent policy for estate liquidity could require initial premiums in the tens of thousands to millions for larger face amounts when structured with cash-funding or PPLI. Always obtain carrier-specific illustrations.

Advisors should obtain multiple carrier illustrations (Prudential, MassMutual, New York Life, Northwestern Mutual) and consider private-placement options for investment customization, tax efficiency, and minimums appropriate to the client’s size.

When gifting can be preferable

  • Client wants to reduce estate size immediately and is comfortable with loss of control.
  • Recipient can manage assets and taxation consequences (e.g., taking carryover basis).
  • Low-cost basis assets where donor prefers to transfer the future appreciation to someone who can use it advantageously (e.g., family members in lower tax brackets).

See: Why Life Insurance Is the Premier Wealth-Transfer Tool for High Net Worth Families for cases where insurance is preferred.

When life insurance is preferable

Practical checklist for advisors working with HNW clients (New York / California / Florida focus)

  • Review federal exemption usage and forecast (current $13.61M per individual in 2024). [IRS guidance][1]
  • Evaluate state estate tax exposure (NY/Mass vs CA/FL).
  • Run carrier illustrations for term, permanent, and PPLI options (Prudential, New York Life, MassMutual, Northwestern Mutual).
  • If using ILITs: confirm Crummey notice processes, gift-tax reporting, and ensure insured retains no incidents of ownership. See: Policy Ownership Strategies: How Entity Relationships Affect Wealth Transfer and Taxes.
  • Model liquidity needs at death (expected estate-tax bill at federal and state levels) and price life-insurance alternatives vs the effect of lifetime gifts.

Conclusion (practical takeaway)

For HNW clients in the U.S., the choice between gifting and life insurance is rarely binary. Lifetime gifting reduces the taxable estate but consumes finite lifetime exemption and may sacrifice step-up benefits on appreciated property; life insurance—especially when held outside the insured’s estate (ILITs or PPLI)—provides liquidity and preserves exemption capacity but requires premium funding and careful ownership structuring. State rules (New York, California, Florida) and product minimums (notably for PPLI) materially affect outcomes. Advisors should run multi-scenario modeling, obtain carrier-specific illustrations from top insurers (Prudential, MassMutual, New York Life, Northwestern Mutual), and coordinate tax, trust, and insurance counsel for optimal results.

Related practical resources:

External references:

Recommended Articles