on Insurance Uncategorized

Combining Trusts and Insurance to Minimize Estate Tax: GRATS, SLATs, and ILITs in Action

High-net-worth families in the United States increasingly combine advanced trust structures with life insurance to preserve wealth, create liquidity for tax payment, and move growth outside the taxable estate. This article explains how Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), Spousal Lifetime Access Trusts (SLATs), and Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs) can be used together—illustrated with practical numbers, carrier examples, and U.S. state considerations (New York, California, Florida).

Why combine trusts and insurance?

  • Estate tax exposure remains material: The federal estate tax top rate is 40%, and while the lifetime exemption is high (approximately $13.6 million per individual in recent years), many HNW families exceed federal or state thresholds. (See IRS guidance below.)
  • Insurance provides liquidity to pay taxes, costs, and equalize inheritances without forced asset sales.
  • Trusts remove appreciation from the estate: Properly structured GRATs and SLATs shift growth to beneficiaries subject to limited gift tax consequences, while ILITs shelter insurance proceeds entirely from estate inclusion when properly funded and administered.

Quick primer: GRATs, SLATs, and ILITs

  • GRAT (Grantor Retained Annuity Trust)

    • Use: Transfer future appreciation of an asset to beneficiaries while retaining annuity payments for a short term (commonly 2–10 years).
    • Tax impact: If the asset’s appreciation outpaces the IRS assumed rate (Section 7520), the excess passes gift-tax- and estate-tax-free.
    • Best when: You have concentrated assets expected to appreciate (stock in a private company, concentrated real estate).

  • SLAT (Spousal Lifetime Access Trust)

    • Use: Irrevocable trust funded by one spouse for the other spouse (and descendants), preserving indirect access and leveraging gift-tax exemption.
    • Tax impact: Removes future appreciation from the donor’s estate while allowing spousal distributions under trustee discretion.
    • Best when: Couples want to shift growth out of the estate while retaining a safety valve through the beneficiary spouse.

  • ILIT (Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust)

    • Use: Owns life insurance on a grantor to keep death benefit out of the insured’s estate, providing tax-free liquidity to beneficiaries.
    • Tax impact: Proceeds are generally estate-tax-free when the insured does not retain incidents of ownership and the ILIT is properly structured and older than 3 years (to avoid the 3-year inclusion rule).
    • Best when: Estate will face a sizeable estate tax bill or needs liquidity for business succession, taxes, or equalization.

How the combination works: three practical structures

  1. GRAT + ILIT (liquidity for transferred growth)

    • Mechanic: Fund a GRAT with a highly-appreciable asset (e.g., founder stock). Transfer post-GRAT appreciation to beneficiaries. Put life insurance in an ILIT sized to cover potential tax on the retained estate or to equalize bequests to family members not receiving business assets.
    • Example (illustrative): Founder, age 62, GRAT transfers $10M of pre-IPO stock into a 5‑year GRAT. If the stock triples in value and the GRAT is successful, millions pass to kids free of estate tax. Meanwhile, an ILIT holds a $10M survivorship policy to provide liquidity for taxes, funded by annual gifts to the ILIT to pay premiums.

  2. SLAT + ILIT (spousal access + outside liquidity)

    • Mechanic: Spouse A gifts $5M to a SLAT for Spouse B and children. The SLAT invests and grows outside Spouse A’s estate. An ILIT purchased with separate premium gifts supplies tax-free cash at death.
    • Benefit: Combined asset protection, estate exclusion, and guaranteed liquidity.

  3. Layered approach for multi-state families (NY/CA/FL)

    • Mechanic: Use a SLAT/GRAT to remove asset growth from the taxable estate, and domicile the ILIT or trustee in a favorable state (e.g., Florida, Texas) where there is no state estate tax or favorable trust law. For New York or California residents, plan around state estate or portability traps.

Pricing and carrier examples (U.S. market)

Life insurance pricing varies by age, health class, product, and underwriting. Below are market-based examples and carrier options commonly used by advisors for HNW planning (published ranges and consumer-facing quotes are used for illustration; obtain specific quoting from carriers).

  • Term policies (liquidity bridge): carriers such as Haven Life (MassMutual-backed) and Policygenius (broker) offer competitive term coverage for younger insureds. Example market pricing from consumer surveys: a healthy 40‑year-old male might pay roughly $30–$80/month for a 20‑year $500k level term (varies widely by underwriting). See Policygenius for sample rate illustrations.
  • Permanent policies for estate planning (ILIT use):
    • New York Life, Northwestern Mutual, MassMutual, and Prudential are commonly used for large survivorship universal life (SUL) or guaranteed universal life (GUL) for ILITs.
    • Example HNW ranges (illustrative): a $5M survivorship universal life policy for a married couple in their early 50s often requires premium funding in the range of $40,000–$200,000 annually depending on product design and underwriting. For single-premium options, carriers may accept $1M+ single premiums to purchase guaranteed protection.
  • Trustees and administration: banks/trust companies (Northern Trust, Bessemer Trust, Fidelity Private Wealth) typically charge 0.5%–1.25% of trust assets annually for trust administration with minimums often ranging $10,000–$25,000/year for smaller trusts. Fees vary by institution and location (New York City and San Francisco trustee fees are often at the high end).

Sources for cost context:

  • Policygenius — life insurance cost research and quotes.
  • Carrier illustration pages (New York Life, MassMutual) for product availability; consult carriers/advisors for formal illustrations.

Comparison table: GRAT vs SLAT vs ILIT

Feature GRAT SLAT ILIT
Primary goal Shift appreciation out of estate Move assets out of donor estate while giving spouse benefits Remove death benefit from estate; provide liquidity
Estate tax benefit Yes — on appreciation beyond Section 7520 rate Yes — gifts remove growth from estate Yes — death proceeds not included if structured correctly
Gift tax use Low gift value if structured well Uses lifetime gift exemption Uses annual exclusion gifts to fund premiums
Typical use case Founder stock, pre-IPO assets Couples with large combined estates Pay estate taxes, equalize inheritances, fund buy-sell
Pros Highly effective for appreciating assets Spousal access flexibility Immediate liquidity, tax-free death benefit
Cons “Zeroed-out” GRAT risk if assets decline Irrevocable; potential divorce/reciprocity issues Premium cost; 3-year rule; administration required
Example cost range (U.S., illustrative) Legal & valuation fees $10k–$50k+ Legal fees $10k–$40k; trustee fees ongoing Premiums $40k–$200k+/yr for HNW SUL designs; trustee fees 0.5–1.25%

Key tactical considerations for U.S. families (New York, California, Florida focus)

  • Watch the 3-year rule: If a grantor transfers a policy to an ILIT within three years of death, proceeds may be included in the estate—plan early.
  • State estate taxes: New York and Massachusetts have separate estate tax thresholds (often much lower than federal). For New York residents, domicile planning and use of ILITs and SLATs can spare state-level liability—coordinate with a state-licensed attorney. See related topic: State Estate Tax Triggers and Insurance Strategies for Multi-State High Net Worth Families.
  • Trustee selection: For ILITs, using an institutional trustee (Northern Trust, Bessemer Trust, or a trusted family friend with corporate co-trustee) helps maintain arms-length ownership and underscores the Irrevocable nature.
  • Gifting to fund premiums: Annual exclusion gifts (e.g., $17,000–$18,000 per donee in recent years; confirm current IRS amounts) can be used to fund ILIT premiums when bundled with Crummey withdrawal powers. For large premium loads, consider grantor funding strategies and split-dollar alternatives—always coordinate with tax counsel.
  • Coordinate GRAT timing with corporate liquidity events (e.g., pre-IPO windows) to maximize transfer of post-GRAT appreciation out of the estate.

Risk management and audit posture

GRATs, SLATs, and ILITs draw IRS attention when poorly documented or when valuation and intent are unclear. Work with specialized estate attorneys, CPAs, and carriers to:

  • Prepare complete GRAT valuations and robust documentation of retained annuity schedules.
  • Draft SLAT provisions that avoid reciprocity traps (mirror-image trusts that could cause inclusion).
  • Ensure ILIT administration follows Crummey notice rules, trust independence, and correct gift-splitting where required.

See deeper modeling and stress-testing guidance in: Modeling Estate Tax Liability: How Insurance Can Plug Liquidity Gaps for HNW Estates.

Implementation checklist (practical next steps)

  1. Run an estate tax projection (federal + state) and liquidity gap analysis.
  2. Identify candidate assets for GRAT transfer (concentrated, high-appreciation potential).
  3. Decide on SLAT funding levels if spousal access is desirable.
  4. Size ILIT life insurance to the net liquidity need (estate taxes + costs + equalization).
  5. Obtain formal life insurance illustrations from carriers (New York Life, MassMutual, Northwestern Mutual, Prudential) and compare SUL vs GUL pricing.
  6. Choose trustee and draft trust instruments with experienced estate counsel in the grantor’s state of domicile.
  7. Test multiple mortality scenarios in planning models. See: Stress-Testing Estate Tax Outcomes: Insurance-Based Solutions Under Multiple Mortality Scenarios.

Conclusion

Combining GRATs and SLATs to shift future appreciation with ILIT-held life insurance for liquidity is a powerful, commercially minded strategy for U.S. high-net-worth estates—particularly in high-tax states like New York and California. Proper design, accurate pricing from reputable carriers, trustee selection, and coordinated tax/legal documentation are essential to achieve immutability from estate inclusion and reduce the likelihood of audit exposure.

Consult experienced estate-planning attorneys, a CPA with estate tax expertise, and a senior life insurance specialist (carrier or broker) to get tailored illustrations and legal instruments before implementing these strategies.

Sources

Recommended Articles