on Business Insurance Uncategorized

Best Insurance For Crop Insurance Survivability: NAC and APH Yield Protections Compared

Choosing the right yield protection strategy can determine whether a farm survives a severe loss year. This article compares NAC (interpreted here as NAP — the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program) and APH (Actual Production History)–based yield protections, showing how each performs for U.S. producers, typical costs, where each makes sense (by state/county examples), and how private carriers and federal programs interplay to maximize survivability.

Key takeaway: APH-based federal crop insurance (through USDA RMA) is the backbone for insurable major crops and generally provides higher, scalable coverage with premium subsidies — ideal for commercial row-crop operations. NAP is a lower-cost safety net for non-insurable or specialty crops but has stricter limits. Many producers combine programs and private endorsements through carriers such as Rain and Hail, ProAg and Nationwide to improve survivability.

Contents

  • What NAC means (clarification)
  • How APH works (basics & coverage levels)
  • How NAP works (who it's for, costs)
  • Side-by-side comparison (table)
  • Pricing examples (specific locations & companies)
  • Decision guide: which to choose by operation
  • Useful resources and internal links

What we mean by "NAC"

The term "NAC" appears in some conversations but is not a standard USDA acronym. In this article we interpret NAC as NAP (the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program) — the federal program administered by USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) that provides catastrophe-level protection for crops not eligible for federal crop insurance. If you meant a different product, please clarify.

Official NAP overview: https://www.farmers.gov/manage/nap

How APH (Actual Production History) yield protections work

What APH provides

  • APH is the historical yield record used by USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA) to set an “approved yield” per acreage.
  • APH is the base for multiple RMA policies:
    • Yield Protection (YP)
    • Revenue Protection (RP) (uses APH yield and price)
    • Actual Production History endorsement for other products
  • Producers choose coverage levels generally from 50% to 85% (some products allow up to 90% in special cases).
  • Premiums are subsidized by RMA; subsidy percentages vary by coverage level and plan.

RMA actuarial and APH guidance: https://www.rma.usda.gov/en/Information-Tools/Actuarial-Information

Strengths of APH

  • Scalable coverage (% of approved yield).
  • Works with major insurable crops (corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, etc.).
  • Robust claims and adjuster process managed under RMA rules.
  • Often used with additional private endorsements (e.g., replant, prevented planting).

Limitations

  • Requires a verifiable 4–10 year production history to establish an APH yield (you can substitute yields, yields of predecessors, or add Trend Adjustments).
  • Not available for many specialty or niche crops — that’s where NAP steps in.

How NAP (Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program) works

What NAP provides

  • NAP is a catastrophic-level program for noninsured crops or where federal insurance is not available.
  • For qualifying crops, NAP typically covers losses greater than 50% of expected production, with payment based on a portion of the county or producer’s average production and the “assigned price.”
  • Service fee: Historically, NAP has required a service fee per crop per producer (e.g., $250 per crop in many program years), though fees and eligibility caps can change. Producers with limited resources (adjusted gross income thresholds) may be exempt or receive reduced fees.
  • Administration is through USDA FSA, not RMA.

Farmers.gov NAP details: https://www.farmers.gov/manage/nap

Strengths of NAP

  • Available for specialty crops, some vegetables, and minor crops without RMA policies.
  • Lower absolute cost (service fee vs. ongoing premiums).
  • Can be vital for small specialty producers (e.g., niche vegetable producers in California or organic growers).

Limitations

  • Generally lower payout levels and higher loss thresholds before indemnity (less granular coverage).
  • Payment limitations and eligibility rules can cap benefits.
  • Not a substitute for APH-based coverage where APH is available.

NAC (NAP) vs APH: Feature comparison

Feature APH-based Yield Protection (RMA) NAP (FSA) — Noninsured Program
Administered by RMA (USDA) FSA (USDA)
Eligible crops Major, insurable crops (corn, soy, wheat, cotton, etc.) Noninsurable/minor/specialty crops
Coverage levels 50%–85% (sometimes up to 90%) Catastrophic-level (losses >50% typical)
Premiums Risk-based; subsidized (producer pays portion) Service fee per crop (e.g., ~$250 historically)
Subsidies Yes — varies by coverage level & plan Fee reductions/exemptions for limited-income producers
Claims process RMA adjusters, detailed production reporting FSA loss adjustment; fewer coverage tunings
Best for Commercial row-crop operations needing revenue/yield protection Small specialty/organic producers or uninsured crops
Add-ons Many endorsements (replant, prevented planting, unit structures) Limited — can combine with some other programs

Pricing examples (real-world context by location and carriers)

Important: crop insurance premiums vary widely by crop, county, yield, coverage level and year. Below are illustrative, research-backed ranges using RMA actuarial trends and typical carrier quotes. For precise pricing get county-specific quotes via RMA or an agent.

Sources: RMA actuarial tools and Farmers.gov program pages (see resources at end).

Example 1 — Corn in Polk County, Iowa (commercial row-crop)

  • Typical APH Yield Protection / Revenue Protection premium (2023–2024 range): $12–$30 per acre gross premium.
  • After RMA subsidy (common subsidy rates reduce producer share by 50–70% depending on coverage), producer-paid premium commonly: $4–$10/acre.
  • Carrier examples: Rain and Hail (a major administrator/distributor) and ProAg commonly quote within these ranges depending on coverage level and unit structure.

Example 2 — Wheat in Finney County, Kansas

  • APH/RP premium: $8–$20/acre gross; producer pays $3–$8/acre after subsidy.
  • Agency carriers: Nationwide and regional agents often offer comparable pricing with different endorsements.

Example 3 — Organic vegetables in Fresno County, California (non-insurable/limited-insurance crops)

  • APH often not an option. NAP is often the only federal option.
  • NAP service fee historically: $250 per crop (producers with qualifying limited-income status may have fee waivers or reductions).
  • Indemnities only after large loss thresholds; NAP payouts are usually smaller than comparable APH payouts on insurable crops.

Carrier notes:

  • Rain and Hail, ProAg and Nationwide are common carriers/agencies that enroll producers in RMA policies and market private endorsements.
  • Private hail or named-peril add-ons (sold by Rain and Hail, Nationwide agents) may cost $3–$15/acre depending on risk, deductible and county exposure.

Sources and tools for county-level figures:

How private carriers fit in (Rain and Hail, ProAg, Nationwide)

  • Private firms primarily act as intermediaries and adjusters for RMA policies (agents) or sell private endorsements (hail, named perils).
  • Typical pattern:
    • Producer buys APH/RP via an authorized agent (e.g., local Rain and Hail agent or ProAg agency).
    • Carrier/agent provides county actuarial quote, files policy, and helps with unit structure to optimize premiums.
    • Private endorsements are available to top-up APH coverage for specific perils.
  • Pricing specifics depend on carrier underwriting, unit structure, and historical loss experience; ask agents in your county (e.g., Polk County, Iowa or Fresno County, California) for itemized quotes.

Decision guide — Which to choose for survivability?

Consider these farm profiles:

  • Large commercial corn/soy operation (Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska)

    • Best: APH/RP or YP — scalable coverage, revenue protection, strong adjuster network.
    • Use private endorsements for hail and replant if needed.

  • Specialty or organic grower (California Central Valley, parts of the Southeast)

    • If crop is non-insurable: NAP is essential as a minimum safety net.
    • Combine with private crop-hail or buyer contracts where possible.

  • Small diversified farm (vegetables, small acreage)

    • NAP for noninsurable crops + consider APH for any insurable crops.
    • Premium cost sensitivity suggests focusing on high-impact crops for APH coverage.

  • Producers needing USDA program eligibility or loan collateral

Next steps to improve crop survivability

  • Get county-specific APH/RP quotes from at least two authorized agents (Rain and Hail/ProAg/Nationwide).
  • For non-insurable crops, enroll in NAP before the application deadline at your local FSA office (service fees and deadlines apply).
  • Review unit structure (basic vs enterprise units) to optimize indemnity frequency — ask your agent for a unit analysis.
  • Track production records to improve APH yield and reduce future premiums per bushel risk.

Related reads:

Authoritative resources

If you operate in Polk County (IA), Finney County (KS), Fresno County (CA) — or another U.S. county — request county-specific APH & NAP quotes from a licensed agent and review the RMA actuarial tables before your sales closing date.

Recommended Articles